Litigation Details for SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. v. EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED (D.N.J. 2015)

SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. v. EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED (D.N.J. 2015)

Docket		Date Filed	2015-01-14
Court	District Court, D. New Jersey	Date Terminated	2017-02-28
Cause	35:145 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	Stanley R. Chesler
Jury Demand	None	Referred To	Cathy L. Waldor
Parties	INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Patents	10,183,006
Attorneys	STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY
Firms	Salvatore R. Guerriero
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Details for SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. v. EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED (D.N.J. 2015)

Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2015-01-14				External link to document

Litigation summary and analysis for: SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. v. EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED (D.N.J. 2015)

Last updated: April 25, 2026

SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA v. EMZURE PHARMACEUTICALS: What litigation record is available in 2:15-cv-00280?

No complete, reliable litigation record is available in the information provided to generate a litigation summary and analysis for SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. v. EMZURE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED | 2:15-cv-00280.

0 facts can be validated from the prompt alone (no court, patent numbers, asserted claims, dates, venue, procedural posture, outcome, or settlement terms). Under strict completeness requirements, an accurate litigation summary cannot be produced.

What can be stated from the filing identifier alone?

Only the case identifier string is present:

• Case: 2:15-cv-00280
• Parties (as provided): SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. v. EMZURE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED

No additional details are present to support any substantive analysis.

---

Key Takeaways

• A litigation summary and analysis requires court record specifics (asserted patents, claims, procedural history, and outcome).
• The prompt provides only a partial case label and docket number, which is insufficient to produce an accurate, decision-grade account.

---

FAQs

1) What patent was at issue in 2:15-cv-00280?
Not provided.

2) Which court and jurisdiction heard the dispute?
Not provided.

3) What was the procedural posture (complaint, preliminary injunction, Markman, summary judgment, trial, or dismissal)?
Not provided.

4) Did either party win at the merits stage?
Not provided.

5) Were there any settlements or license terms recorded?
Not provided.

---

References (APA)

[1] No citable sources were provided in the prompt.